Plagiarism is not what you stole, but what you failed to appropriate.
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 8:55 am
The reaction to accusations of plagiarism can be unexpected. In 2014, the American company Segway accused the Chinese manufacturer Ninbot of plagiarism. As a result, the Chinese company bought the Segway company along with all the patents. Of course, this is impossible in science - authorship of a scientific discovery cannot be bought.
But the definition of authorship sometimes also raises questions. The times of lone scientists have passed, and scientific discoveries are born as a result of the work of a whole team of scientists, who of them should be considered the author? How to find stolen ideas in the mass of scientific papers, of which hundreds of thousands are published annually?
Every year, about 10-12 thousand candidate buy peru telemarketing data and 1.5 thousand doctoral dissertations pass through the Higher Attestation Commission, not to mention scientific publications. It is impossible to keep track of them all. The expectation is that cases of plagiarism will be reported by the scientists themselves, who, as a rule, are well acquainted with the research in their field. For this purpose, a rule was introduced for the mandatory publication of a dissertation before its defense on the website of the organization where the dissertation council was created.
The problem of plagiarism is not only connected with dissertations – these cases are simply the easiest to track down – but also with scientific publications. The fact that scientific ethics is given great importance all over the world is evidenced by the work of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). It was founded in 1997 in the UK for editors of scientific journals, and now it includes more than 10 thousand interested persons all over the world.
Plagiarism is an imitation of scientific work, and it does not advance science in any way, and therefore does not contribute to the development of human society. Even when borrowing some ideas and provisions, a real scientist subjects them to intellectual processing, presenting new scientific knowledge, a new view of the problem. Therefore, the fight against plagiarism is a fight for the very existence of science and for the future of humanity.
But the definition of authorship sometimes also raises questions. The times of lone scientists have passed, and scientific discoveries are born as a result of the work of a whole team of scientists, who of them should be considered the author? How to find stolen ideas in the mass of scientific papers, of which hundreds of thousands are published annually?
Every year, about 10-12 thousand candidate buy peru telemarketing data and 1.5 thousand doctoral dissertations pass through the Higher Attestation Commission, not to mention scientific publications. It is impossible to keep track of them all. The expectation is that cases of plagiarism will be reported by the scientists themselves, who, as a rule, are well acquainted with the research in their field. For this purpose, a rule was introduced for the mandatory publication of a dissertation before its defense on the website of the organization where the dissertation council was created.
The problem of plagiarism is not only connected with dissertations – these cases are simply the easiest to track down – but also with scientific publications. The fact that scientific ethics is given great importance all over the world is evidenced by the work of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). It was founded in 1997 in the UK for editors of scientific journals, and now it includes more than 10 thousand interested persons all over the world.
Plagiarism is an imitation of scientific work, and it does not advance science in any way, and therefore does not contribute to the development of human society. Even when borrowing some ideas and provisions, a real scientist subjects them to intellectual processing, presenting new scientific knowledge, a new view of the problem. Therefore, the fight against plagiarism is a fight for the very existence of science and for the future of humanity.