bunch of literature on the

[lopebix427]

e point of racking our brains over two sentences more than over an entire article for the sake of an incomprehensible formal requirement?

Tip #8: Avoid hypotheses like fire
We are young scientists. Our job is to process a topic and draw some conclusions. How can we assume anything if we ourselves do not yet know what we will write about, what to find out or prove? Again, it is immodest for a student or postgraduate to put forward his immature assumptions.

Tip #9: Write the introduction after the main body
Since these bores insist so much, we can write this introduction. buy afghanistan phone data The main thing is to have the finished text in front of you. Based on the results, we can estimate what our goal was. If we divide the text into several parts, we will find the tasks. In the literature review, we will take a couple of the most famous names (obviously, they have worked on the issue more than others). We will formulate scientific novelty using the formula "First time + <title>". And try to prove that we have not done this for the first time. Well, to justify the relevance, we will complain about the global problems of humanity.

Previous materials in the series:

Bad Advice on Formulating Article Titles

Harmful tips for writing annotations