Scrum vs Kanban Methodology

Networking at Lead Sale forum drives success
Post Reply
Decjkf
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2024 3:47 am

Scrum vs Kanban Methodology

Post by Decjkf »

We can find explanations where Scrum is compared in the same context with Agile, when this is not entirely correct. Agile is a philosophy for project management that provides a universe of ideas and concepts of great value, but it is not, in itself, a series of standardized techniques to achieve it. Then comes Scrum, the clear and structured methodology, as a product of the Agile philosophy. We can also correctly say that Scrum is a way to implement the Agile system in your organization.
Without further ado, let's find out what else is out there.
Like Scrum, Kanban is a practical methodology to israel phone number list implement project management in an organization. Anyone who has used Trello at some point has had contact with the Kanban methodology. It is based on a fluid and continuous process, with the least possible friction and pauses.

Image

Kanban is a methodology that prioritizes the visualization of work using boards (known as Kanban boards) with dynamic columns, which contain the tasks to come, in progress and completed, as well as other data necessary during the development of each project.

Kanban is often recommended for teams with the mission of completing a project in the shortest amount of time possible. The visual element of the board and its columns, among other techniques, seek to stimulate production speed and work in progress is limited so that tasks receive a greater investment of effort at a time.

This reduction in work times usually comes at a cost in the team's ability to learn. At the same time, less structure is required to implement Kanban and greater flexibility is enjoyed in said implementation. An example of flexibility, also with its inherent cost, is the absence of strict roles such as those found in a Scrum Team.

Kanban is based on fluidity and the visual representation of work while Scrum is committed to the continuous improvement of team capabilities and learning. We can see that both methods differ ideologically, prioritizing completely different things. Let's see a clearer example of this below.
Post Reply